
- ALI Copyright Restatement Project
- Chairman Goodlatte Announces Retirement
- Copyright and NAFTA Renegotiations
- Copyright Small Claims
- DMCA Hearings and Legislative Reform
- Economic and Professional Initiatives to Assist Creators During the Coronavirus
- Educational Content Addressing Race and Racism
- Fair Use Week
- H.R. 1695
- Internet Archive Continues to Harm Authors
- Karyn Temple, 13th Register of Copyrights
- KinderGuides Case
- Music Licensing Reform
- Open Letters to President Donald Trump
- Reform of the U.S. Copyright Office News
- Register of Copyrights Legislation
- Register of Copyrights News
- Resources from Creative Community to Ease Coronavirus Impact
- S 1010
- World IP Day 2018 Recap
- World IP Day 2019 Recap
- World IP Day 2020
In March 2020, the Internet Archive – an organization founded in 1996 by multi-millionaire Brewster Kahle – launched a “National Emergency Library” that made 1.4 million digital books available online for free as a means to address “our unprecedented global and immediate need for access to reading and research material” during the Covid-19 outbreak. However, instead of adhering to a “one-in, one-out” ebook lending system used by public libraries, the Internet Archive suspended waitlists and announced that it would lend books to anyone in the world at the same time – denying authors the revenue they deserve and urgently need during the economic downturn caused by the Coronavirus.
On June 1, 2020, the Association of American Publishers (AAP) filed suit against the Internet Archive on behalf of numerous book publisher members, including Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, John Wiley & Sons, and Penguin Random House. The suit asks the court to enjoin IA’s mass scanning and distribution of literary works that it offers to the public through both its “Open Library” and “National Emergency Library.” According to a statement released by AAP, its CEO Maria Pallante noted, “[The] complaint [filed] illustrates that the Internet Archive is conducting and promoting copyright infringement on a massive scale. In scanning and distributing literary works to which it has no legal or contractual rights, IA deliberately misappropriates the intellectual and financial investments of authors and publishers and brazenly ignores the copyright law that Congress enacted. According to a statement by Copyright Alliance CEO Keith Kupferschmid, he noted, “For too long, IA has brazenly scanned and distributed published works while refusing to abide by the traditional contours of copyright law. IA would like the public to believe that the books are rare and older titles used for research, but in reality, they are scanning and distributing recent works, fiction and non-fiction, thrillers and kids’ books — all without the authority of publishers and authors and well beyond the scope of what is permitted by copyright law.” According to an Authors Guild statement, President and author Doug Preston added, “Internet Archive’s wholesale scanning and posting of copyrighted books without the consent of authors, and without paying a dime, is piracy hidden behind a sanctimonious veil of progressivism.”
In mid-June, the Internet Archive closed its National Emergency Library ahead of schedule, but Kahle continued to defend the Internet Archive’s efforts. In a New York Times article, he was quoted as saying, “As a library, the Internet Archive acquires books and lends them, as libraries have always done. This supports publishing and authors and readers. Publishers suing libraries for lending books, in this case, protected digitized versions, and while schools and libraries are closed, is not in anyone’s interest.”
Unfortunately for the Internet Archive and Kahle, authors and publishers broadly disagree with this approach and sentiment. According to a statement quoting authors Malcolm Gladwell, John Grisham, Elizabeth Gilbert and Douglas Preston, the “wholesale scanning and posting of copyrighted books without the consent of authors, and without paying a dime, is piracy hidden behind a sanctimonious veil of progressivism.”
Please see below for more information regarding industry and media responses to the Internet Archive’s “National Emergency Library” and to its continued efforts to lend books without compensating authors and publishers.
Calls to Action:
- Join Authors Guild in Signing Open letter to Internet Archive Calling for the Immediate Shut Down of the National Emergency Library
- U.S. Copyright Office Responds to Senator Udall’s Request for Legal Analysis of National Emergency Library
Blogs:
- It was the worst of times, it was the worst of times: The Internet Archive’s Misguided Effort to Liberate Books (Neil Turkewitz)
- The Emergence of Copyright Looting (Copyright Alliance)
- Open Letter to Brewster Kahle From Anonymous Librarian (The Trichordist)
- The Liberating Authors from the Means of their Survival Edition (Neil Turkewitz)
- Internet Archive Uses Pandemic to Justify Looting (Illusion of More)
- 12 Questions For Boston Public Library President On “Emergency National Library” Endorsement (The Trichordist)
- Tell Internet Archive to Remove Your Books from the So-Called National Emergency Library (Authors Guild)
- Authors Protest Internet Archive Pirating Their Books (The Digital Reader)
- COVID is Not an Excuse to Throw the Accepted Rules Out the Window: Copyright as the Canary in the Coalmine. (Hugh Stephens Blog)
- The Controversy Over the National Emergency Library (Plagiarism Today)
- A Legal Analysis of Making Copyrighted Works Available Online During the Coronavirus Crisis (Hudson Institute)
- Internet Archive’s “Emergency Library”: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing (Copyright Alliance)
- Copyright Notebook: Observations on Copyright in the Time of COVID-19 (CPIP)
- The Agony and the Ecstasy: A Response to PublicKnowledge’s Call to Arms in Defense of the Internet Archive (Neil Turkewitz)
- Superpowers In River City: Anti-Artist Activist Brewster Kahle’s Revealing “National Emergency Library,” the Faux Triumph of Privilege (Chris Castle)
- Piercing the Sanctimonious Veil of Progressivism: An Examination of a Defense of the Internet Archive Grounded in an Alternative Reality (Neil Turkewitz)
Media Coverage and Op-Eds:
- Authors, Publishers Condemn the ‘National Emergency Library’ As ‘Piracy’ (NPR)
- ‘Emergency’ Online Library Draws Ire of Some Authors (New York Times)
- Copyright Alliance Blasts Internet Archive’s Emergency Library launch as “Vile” (ZDNet)
- The Internet Archive’s Copyright Emergency (Copyright and Technology)
- The Internet Archive Started an “Emergency” Online Library. Authors Are Furious. (Slate)
- The Pandemic Is Not an Excuse to Exploit Writers (NYTimes op-Ed by Douglas Preston)
- The National Emergency Library Must Support Both Authors and Readers. (Washington Square News op-Ed by Helen Wajda)
- Copyright Office Skeptical of ‘Emergency Library’ Legality (2) (Bloomberg Law)
Statements:
- Internet Archive’s National Emergency Library Harms Authors (Authors Guild)
- AAP President and CEO Maria Pallante on the Internet Archive’s “National Emergency Library” (AAP)
- Internet Archive Removes Controls on “Lending” of Bootleg e-Books (National Writers Union)