11 Reasons Why a Small Claims Bill Should Pass | Reason Six: Lisa — Graphic Artist

Graphic artist looking at colors

In 1990-1991, I was a freelance independent contractor working at a major toy company in New York City. During this period, my art was infringed and used on hundreds of thousands of product packages for a doll that was sold nationally. I asked for a licensing fee from the toy company that used my art, but they refused. The legal department told me, “So, sue the company.” Then an intellectual property attorney noted that, technically, I had copyright law on my side, but that suing the largest toy company in the U.S would cost too much. If they had just paid me their standard package design fee for an image – say $3,400 – I’d have been thrilled. That would’ve paid my rent and bills for a few months. But they knew they could get away with stealing my work, so they did.

Most professional artists have had their work infringed. It’s sort of a sick “compliment”; somebody will steal your work if it’s really good. Nobody steals bad art. And sadly, infringement of copyrighted images is rampant in the internet age. Look around you. Everything you see has an image, design, or pattern on it – including clothing, product packaging, and the websites you read. These are all examples of work by artists and creators, many of whom run small businesses and simply cannot afford to have money stolen by infringers.

Unfortunately, without a Small Claims court in place to facilitate “smaller” copyright infringement claims, and with Federal Court being too expensive and arduous for creators to use for such disputes, there is no recourse for independent artists to take when their work is infringed. Further, a recent survey by the American Bar Association indicates that attorneys simply won’t undertake infringement cases if damages are less than $30,000.

But there is a viable solution on the horizon that’s supported by artists and creators of all kinds, which is the creation of a Small Claims Court to handle copyright infringement claims.

Why should we believe that The CASE Act’s proposed Small Claims court is a viable solution? For starters, it’s a plan that’s been discussed and researched for many years, including significant research that’s been conducted and shared by the U.S. Copyright Office.

Back in 2006, when I was the National Advocacy Liaison for the Graphic Artists Guild, the Copyright Office called me for input about an artist’s experience with “small value infringement,” and asked my opinion about the creation of a copyright “small claims” court.  Shortly thereafter, the Copyright Office conducted a formal study. There were also roundtable discussions conducted with authors, songwriters, creators, publishers, user/consumer groups and numerous other interested parties.

In 2012, the Copyright Office asked organizations representing visual artists to conduct a national survey of artists and photographers about infringement of our works and our opinions about the creation of a copyright “small claims” court. In 2013, the Copyright Office released the results of its research via a study titled Remedies for Copyright Small Claims. In the report, it recommended that a small claims court be created to handle copyright claims that are too small to bring to federal court. The report also found that individual authors and creators suffered significant copyright infringements, and overwhelmingly favored a low-cost alternative dispute resolution.

I urge visual artists – and creators of all kinds – to contact your Congressional representative, and ask him or her to support of a Small Claims court. It takes just a few minutes to send a letter to your representative by clicking here, and doing so will benefit creators across the country.

Lisa F. Shaftel,
Shaftel & Schmelzer; Artists’ Advocates

This blog tells the story of countless U.S. creators, who currently have rights but no remedies when it comes to protecting their works. With federal court being both complex and expensive, most creators don’t have the means to defend their creations from a legal perspective. That’s why they need the CASE Act, legislation that calls for the establishment of a small claims tribunal within the U.S. Copyright Office. Learn more here about the CASE Act, and how it would benefit creators across the country!

We urge you to contact your congressman/woman, and tell them why this bill is so important. Your support will give small creators the tools to protect their work.

Photo Credit: Wavebreakmedia/iStock/thinkstock

get blog updates