Copyright Alliance
Join Now
Login
  • about
    • Who We Are
    • Who We Represent
    • Leadership
    • Boards
    • Contact Us
  • issues & policy
    • Statements to Congress
    • Agency and other Filings
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers
    • Copyright Subject Matter Search
  • copyright law
    • Copyright Act
    • Copyright Regulations
    • Copyright Office Compendium
    • Copyright Cases
    • Copyright Legislation
    • Government Reports
    • Congressional Hearings
    • International Agreements
  • resources
    • Find a Copyright Attorney
    • Creator Services
    • Creator Assistance Directory
    • find a copyright owner
    • Research Papers
    • Copyright Facts by State
    • Classroom Resources
    • REPORT PIRACY
  • news & events
    • Blogs
    • Press Releases
    • Media Center
    • Trending Topics
    • Event Calendar
  • education
    • videos
    • FAQs
    • Ask The Alliance
    • Copyright Law Explained
    • copyright courses
  • get involved
    • Join the Alliance
    • Add Your Voice
    • Copyright Alliance Policy Alert
image

Spanski v. Telewizja

  • Allen v. Cooper
  • BMG v. Cox
  • Brammer v. Violent Hues
  • BWP Media v. Polyvore
  • Bynum v. Texas A&M University Athletic Department
  • Capitol Records v. ReDigi
  • Disney v. VidAngel
  • Dr. Seuss Enterprises v. ComicMix
  • Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com
  • Fox News Network v. TVEyes
  • Georgia v. Public Resource Org
  • Green (EFF) v. DOJ
  • Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons
  • Lang Van v. VNG
  • Oracle v. Google
  • Perfect 10 v. Giganews
  • Rentmeester v. Nike
  • Rimini Street v. Oracle
  • SAS Institute v. World Programming Limited
  • Spanski v. Telewizja
  • UMG Recordings v. Kurbanov
  • University of Houston System v. Jim Olive Photography
  • Valancourt Books v. Temple
  • VHT v. Zillow

Spanski Enterprises, Inc., sued Polish broadcaster, Telewizja Polska (“TV Polska”), for infringing on Spanski’s exclusive North and South American performance rights in TV Polska’s programs. Despite licensing Spanski the exclusive North and South American public performance rights to these programs, TV Polska streamed them on its video-on-demand system and failed to properly geoblock, making them accessible to North and South American internet users.

In December 2016, the District Court of the District of Columbia held TV Polska liable for directly infringing Spanki’s exclusive United States performance rights and awarded Spanski around $3 million in damages for willful infringement. TV Polska subsequently appealed on both issues of liability and infringement.

In March 2018, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the district court’s rulings on both infringement and damages. The Court found that TV Polska’s actions clearly fell within the Copyright Act’s definition of performing a work publicly, and that “TV Polska played a more active role in performing infringing content than did Aereo,” as TV Polska “purposefully selected” the copyrighted content. The Court also concluded that even if an infringing performance originates abroad, it is still actionable if it “ultimately reaches viewers in the United States.”


Procedural History

Status: Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed. (March 2, 2018)

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Mar. 2, 2018)

District Court for the District of Columbia (Dec. 2, 2016)

Amicus Briefs

U.S. Copyright Office

Back to Copyright Cases

copyright alliance

1331 h street nw, suite 701

washington, dc 20005

202-540-2243

copyrightalliance.org

join the alliance
Donate
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
contact us disclaimer privacy policy

© 2021 Copyright Alliance

COVID-19 Update: Resources from Creative Community to Ease Coronavirus Impact READ MORE
+